The acidifying oceans
As I scan the wires for the latest science news, especially as it relates to climate change, something ominous has increasingly been catching my attention. And that is how complicated, entwined and linked are the oceans and the atmosphere of our planet. If you tweak one the other, in some way or another, also gets tweaked.
My focus has always been, as I look for the latest research, news and facts, on the major greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide. Its a the major constituent of our societies drive to create energy out of fossil fuels and over the past century has fueled most of the climate change that we have increasingly witnessed. And its rise has proven to be a direct cause in resetting the planetary thermostat to ever higher levels, so my focus has been all about temperature-related issues.
And when I do look at ocean trends, I tended to focus on phenomena like El Nino, Hurricane frequency, rising levels and ice melt. Rarely did I consider the impact that increased CO2 had on the chemistry of the oceans nor the did I give the ramifications this change might have on ocean life much thought.
That, too, sadly, now is changing. The rising carbon dioxide in the atmosphere also means that oceans levels are rising too. The atmosphere is in direct contact with the surface of the ocean and the interface is 70 per cent of the entire surface of the Earth. As the carbon dioxide has risen in the air it has also risen in the oceans. But the effects on life in the oceans is one that is dramatically different. CO2 in the atmosphere is inert and doesn’t really react chemically with most of the gases. That is part of the problem on CO2. It stays around for a long time, once you create it.
In the oceans it also sticks around, but it first reacts chemically with the water to create carbonic acid and therein lies the rub. This acid has a profound and deadly effect on life in the oceans, just the way that sulphur dioxide did in the atmosphere when combined with rain to make acid rain, which killed fish, maple trees and frogs. Carbonic acid wreaks havoc on shell fish, mollusks and reefs. And the effect is now being found around the world. We have known for years that shell fish of all sorts are highly dependent on their surroundings. Now we are finding first hand evidence that tells us the effects are probably ten times higher that was projected even a few years ago. Reefs and mollusks are dying and dying rapidly. And before you dismiss this there are a couple of factors that need to be noted. All life comes from the oceans. It began there first and then branched out to the land. And all life is linked. Its one vast chain. And by undermining the lowly shell fish and their ilk we also, in unknown and unseen ways pave the way for our own instability. Secondly, all of the major mass extinctions of past 545 million years, called the Phanerozoic, showed that when marine life was affected, so to were the land creatures. Just because we don’t yet understand the exact mechanism, doesn’t mean we should not be concerned.
Its yet another brick in the wall of our continued self absorption and blindness to what impact our industry is having on the ecosystem that ultimately support us.
2 Responses to “ The acidifying oceans ”
Add New Comment




November 28th, 2008 at 5:12 pm
There has been much more CO2 in the atmosphere and, presumably, the oceans in past eons. Where did all the CO2 for the calcium carbonate tied up in limestone around the world come from?
The pH of the ocean is around 8.2, which is well into alkaline territory. It would take huge amounts of any acidic material to change that, which neglects the question of sea lifeforms that absorb CO2 and sink to the bottom.
Which reefs are dying?
Richard, you are reading only the alarmist websites and regurgitating what they publish instead of presenting well-balanced science. A pity, because you seem quite bright.
December 7th, 2008 at 1:42 pm
Ok I don’t get this. I try to be a believer, I really do. I want to follow the faith of C02 like all my friends, but I just can’t. There are parts of this story that I just can’t get past. Like when the UNIPCC release their landmark study in 2007, and they stated that it was unoquivical, humans are responsible for global warming, that was the end of the debate. Great, so I downloaded the report and low and behold, it was nothing but one wishy washy equivovaction after another, there was virtually nothing that was solid in the whole report. I was devastated.
And then from a Science website, one that stated that humans are resposnsible for global warming, they wrote that Ice cores have proven that C02 levels change AFTER the temperasture of the earth has already changed. The delay was stated to be between 200 and 800 years on average. I can’t help but ask myself “How can something happening now, be the CAUSE of an event that happened 800 years ago?” It can be an effect of that event sure, but not the cause. It just can’t be. So elevated C02 does not cause climate change, the ice cores prove this.
I’m sorry, but until this gaping hole is explained to me, I just can’t get onboard the C02 bandwagon. Much as I want to, I just can’t (yet).