<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aw, Nuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/</link>
	<description>Covering the MLB with a focus on the Toronto Blue Jays</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42760</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42760</guid>
		<description>Wilner: So John Mac was phenomenal and Lind was fantastic... that&#039;s your opinion of their performance on your radio show. Nice guys, but too bad they can&#039;t play like they interview.The only original athlete interview was the first one! I think your colleague McCown is right on this one..talking to pro athletes is like talking to morons (his words, my friend)...they really have nothing of interest to say. The only original interview with an athlete was the first one (my words).

MW:  I&#039;m not sure what to say to this.  You have a problem with the way Lind and McDonald played this season?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilner: So John Mac was phenomenal and Lind was fantastic&#8230; that&#8217;s your opinion of their performance on your radio show. Nice guys, but too bad they can&#8217;t play like they interview.The only original athlete interview was the first one! I think your colleague McCown is right on this one..talking to pro athletes is like talking to morons (his words, my friend)&#8230;they really have nothing of interest to say. The only original interview with an athlete was the first one (my words).</p>
<p>MW:  I&#8217;m not sure what to say to this.  You have a problem with the way Lind and McDonald played this season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42647</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42647</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike,
If the Series goes to 7 games, what do you think about starting Hamels for 3-4 innings then bringing in Lee? I don&#039;t have the stats, but from what I can remember Hamels has pitched well in the first few innings before falling apart, and cutting the innings down for Lee on short rest would help him out a lot. 
Thanks

MW:  Sorry, I should have answered this one sooner.  If the series had gone to seven, I would have started Hamels with J.A. Happ pretty much up in the bullpen from pitch one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike,<br />
If the Series goes to 7 games, what do you think about starting Hamels for 3-4 innings then bringing in Lee? I don&#8217;t have the stats, but from what I can remember Hamels has pitched well in the first few innings before falling apart, and cutting the innings down for Lee on short rest would help him out a lot.<br />
Thanks</p>
<p>MW:  Sorry, I should have answered this one sooner.  If the series had gone to seven, I would have started Hamels with J.A. Happ pretty much up in the bullpen from pitch one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jw</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42620</link>
		<dc:creator>jw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42620</guid>
		<description>Mike, 
Just listened to Mike Toth&#039;s, I think, interview with Jermy Acardo. Toth said that Pettitte was a borderline HOFer while Pedro was a HOFer. But Pettitte has more wins, the stat the seems to be key factor in deciding HOF status for pitchers. So how can one be borderline and the other a shoe-in?

MW:  I think it was Mike Hogan&#039;s interview.  It&#039;s shoo-in, by the way, and wins isn&#039;t the stat that decides Hall of Fame status among pitchers, unless a guy has 300 or more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
Just listened to Mike Toth&#8217;s, I think, interview with Jermy Acardo. Toth said that Pettitte was a borderline HOFer while Pedro was a HOFer. But Pettitte has more wins, the stat the seems to be key factor in deciding HOF status for pitchers. So how can one be borderline and the other a shoe-in?</p>
<p>MW:  I think it was Mike Hogan&#8217;s interview.  It&#8217;s shoo-in, by the way, and wins isn&#8217;t the stat that decides Hall of Fame status among pitchers, unless a guy has 300 or more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darrell bishop</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42619</link>
		<dc:creator>darrell bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42619</guid>
		<description>michael,
i forgot to mention to you, you made (what i thought) was an interesting observation re: the coaching changes with the blue jays in your previous post. just curious if i was reading between the lines correctly on it.
something to the effect that there seemed to be compromises made all around on the final decisions made &amp; the players probably didn&#039;t get what they were hoping for, a new field boss for next yr. (based on the obverall dissention brought to your attention late in the yr. by a large group of the players)
it&#039;s not too hard to get a read on how you feel about mr. gaston as manager of this club granted. certainly lots of peculiar ideas &amp; strategies on how to manage a ball game &amp; team from that man. no lies there. (and i could probably go either way on the man. i see good &amp; bad with him &amp; his general conduct day to day)
but don&#039;t you think to a great degree it was important that the players of this team didn&#039;t get their way on this issue &amp; have him out the door on their whim just like that.
just think that they have not done nearly enough as a team in terms of overall success to warrant a pass out the door for gaston based on his credentials compared to theirs.
they haven&#039;t earned the right yet it says here.
and i&#039;m guessing that was maybe beeston&#039;s assessment of the situation as well based on the final decision made on that one.
agree disagree?

MW:  I agree that that was likely Beeston assessment, and I agree that the players shouldn&#039;t have control over the hiring and firing of a manager.  But I do think that management has a responsibility to put its players in the best possible position to succeed as often as possible, and Cito simply doesn&#039;t do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michael,<br />
i forgot to mention to you, you made (what i thought) was an interesting observation re: the coaching changes with the blue jays in your previous post. just curious if i was reading between the lines correctly on it.<br />
something to the effect that there seemed to be compromises made all around on the final decisions made &amp; the players probably didn&#8217;t get what they were hoping for, a new field boss for next yr. (based on the obverall dissention brought to your attention late in the yr. by a large group of the players)<br />
it&#8217;s not too hard to get a read on how you feel about mr. gaston as manager of this club granted. certainly lots of peculiar ideas &amp; strategies on how to manage a ball game &amp; team from that man. no lies there. (and i could probably go either way on the man. i see good &amp; bad with him &amp; his general conduct day to day)<br />
but don&#8217;t you think to a great degree it was important that the players of this team didn&#8217;t get their way on this issue &amp; have him out the door on their whim just like that.<br />
just think that they have not done nearly enough as a team in terms of overall success to warrant a pass out the door for gaston based on his credentials compared to theirs.<br />
they haven&#8217;t earned the right yet it says here.<br />
and i&#8217;m guessing that was maybe beeston&#8217;s assessment of the situation as well based on the final decision made on that one.<br />
agree disagree?</p>
<p>MW:  I agree that that was likely Beeston assessment, and I agree that the players shouldn&#8217;t have control over the hiring and firing of a manager.  But I do think that management has a responsibility to put its players in the best possible position to succeed as often as possible, and Cito simply doesn&#8217;t do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Ker</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42617</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Ker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42617</guid>
		<description>Well, the bad AJ showed up and the Phils push it to game 6.

I win a pizza if the Yanks win it in 6 (definite head over heart bet there), so here&#039;s hoping they wrap it up.

Sutcliffe on Sportnet kept talking about the different strikezone with different umpires.  Burnett wasn&#039;t getting the close calls.

Should be exciting tomorrow night.

What feed is sportsnet using fo the game?, It isn&#039;t FOX, and there is no advertising anywhere to see where it is coming from.

MW:  Sportsnet used the MLB International feed for the game - they&#039;ve been doing it for a few years now.  Congrats on the pizza.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the bad AJ showed up and the Phils push it to game 6.</p>
<p>I win a pizza if the Yanks win it in 6 (definite head over heart bet there), so here&#8217;s hoping they wrap it up.</p>
<p>Sutcliffe on Sportnet kept talking about the different strikezone with different umpires.  Burnett wasn&#8217;t getting the close calls.</p>
<p>Should be exciting tomorrow night.</p>
<p>What feed is sportsnet using fo the game?, It isn&#8217;t FOX, and there is no advertising anywhere to see where it is coming from.</p>
<p>MW:  Sportsnet used the MLB International feed for the game &#8211; they&#8217;ve been doing it for a few years now.  Congrats on the pizza.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudio</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42615</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42615</guid>
		<description>Michael, was listening to the Dirk Hayhurst interview &amp; he said he found out about the clubhouse &#039;so called&#039; major issue through the paper his wife showed him. It goes to show that the whole Cito thing was way overblown &amp; media hyped. The media always likes to make minor off field stuff like this into a natural disaster since the team looses &amp; wants to write a reason for the team&#039;s performance. It&#039;s great for ratings &amp; great to sell papers. At first, I thought it was a big deal but once I heard some of the players, Cito &amp; Beeston, it was only a hand full of players. If some players didn&#039;t even know about it in the clubhouse, it can&#039;t be a big issue. Issues like these always come up when a team looses, not when their winning. If players like Wells or who ever has even a small issue, it&#039;s their fault for not talking to Cito or any of the managers about it behind closed doors. Kind of immature &amp; a coward act using the media first &amp; not trying to talk it over &amp; trying to fix the minor issue first.  A team is like a family. These players spend almost the whole year together. It&#039;s great that the Jays found a middle ground &amp; Cito will be back next season. I will definitely go to the ball park &amp; can&#039;t wait for the  &#039;10 year. He will make a great consultant for the team moving foward after with all his experience.

MW:  If Hayhurst didn&#039;t know about the clubhouse issue, then he either wasn&#039;t paying attention or wasn&#039;t talking to his teammates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, was listening to the Dirk Hayhurst interview &amp; he said he found out about the clubhouse &#8216;so called&#8217; major issue through the paper his wife showed him. It goes to show that the whole Cito thing was way overblown &amp; media hyped. The media always likes to make minor off field stuff like this into a natural disaster since the team looses &amp; wants to write a reason for the team&#8217;s performance. It&#8217;s great for ratings &amp; great to sell papers. At first, I thought it was a big deal but once I heard some of the players, Cito &amp; Beeston, it was only a hand full of players. If some players didn&#8217;t even know about it in the clubhouse, it can&#8217;t be a big issue. Issues like these always come up when a team looses, not when their winning. If players like Wells or who ever has even a small issue, it&#8217;s their fault for not talking to Cito or any of the managers about it behind closed doors. Kind of immature &amp; a coward act using the media first &amp; not trying to talk it over &amp; trying to fix the minor issue first.  A team is like a family. These players spend almost the whole year together. It&#8217;s great that the Jays found a middle ground &amp; Cito will be back next season. I will definitely go to the ball park &amp; can&#8217;t wait for the  &#8217;10 year. He will make a great consultant for the team moving foward after with all his experience.</p>
<p>MW:  If Hayhurst didn&#8217;t know about the clubhouse issue, then he either wasn&#8217;t paying attention or wasn&#8217;t talking to his teammates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42616</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42616</guid>
		<description>Mike,

I am so glad that AJ got the loss and that he was pulled after getting his 6 earned runs. 

It looked like the Yankees were going to pull off one of their patented comebacks especially with the way their bullpen hasn&#039;t got it done. I was yelling at the TV last night with Tex up and was not looking forward to an AB with A-Rod and two on. 

The world series has been fun to watch and it&#039;s interesting to watch these two teams work. With Utley&#039;s five home runs in the series, will the Yankees just walk him and pitch to the strike out king (of the world series) Howard?

The Phillies bullpen has not been good and against hitters has good as Damon / A-Rod / Posada the Phillies will have to put up alot of runs to take game 6. With Pettitte on there&#039;s a chance again that the Phillies will get the early lead and hopefully will be able to hold it. 

Go Phillies!

I agree with the positive comments about Vernon. Let&#039;s hope that he bounces back nicely next spring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>I am so glad that AJ got the loss and that he was pulled after getting his 6 earned runs. </p>
<p>It looked like the Yankees were going to pull off one of their patented comebacks especially with the way their bullpen hasn&#8217;t got it done. I was yelling at the TV last night with Tex up and was not looking forward to an AB with A-Rod and two on. </p>
<p>The world series has been fun to watch and it&#8217;s interesting to watch these two teams work. With Utley&#8217;s five home runs in the series, will the Yankees just walk him and pitch to the strike out king (of the world series) Howard?</p>
<p>The Phillies bullpen has not been good and against hitters has good as Damon / A-Rod / Posada the Phillies will have to put up alot of runs to take game 6. With Pettitte on there&#8217;s a chance again that the Phillies will get the early lead and hopefully will be able to hold it. </p>
<p>Go Phillies!</p>
<p>I agree with the positive comments about Vernon. Let&#8217;s hope that he bounces back nicely next spring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian from Whitby</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42613</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian from Whitby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42613</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike,

You know, the Phillies&#039; bats woke up last night and I&#039;m thinking trouble could be ahead for the Yanks. All along, I was thinking that the 3 man rotation could come back to haunt the Yankees. Game 6 is huge. Can 37 yr old Andy Pettitte respond on 3 days rest? Clearly, AJ Burnett had his problems (but that wasn&#039;t necessarlit because he pitched on 3 days rest). If Petitte falters, that forces Game 7 with CC again on 3 days rest. Now I know he is a horse and has been doing this for a while now, but you never know. Maybe I&#039;m wrong, but with the Yankees up 3-1, I might have gone to Chad Gaudin in Game 5, knowing that there was still Game 6 and 7 in New York witha rested Burnett or Petitte for Game 6 and CC for Game 7. If the Phils get into the Yankee &#039;pen (before the great Rivera), that changes everything. They have not been effective. Of course, the Philly pen is a powder keg as well.

MW:  It is.  I was very surprised that Pettitte pitched as effectively as he did in Game 6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p>
<p>You know, the Phillies&#8217; bats woke up last night and I&#8217;m thinking trouble could be ahead for the Yanks. All along, I was thinking that the 3 man rotation could come back to haunt the Yankees. Game 6 is huge. Can 37 yr old Andy Pettitte respond on 3 days rest? Clearly, AJ Burnett had his problems (but that wasn&#8217;t necessarlit because he pitched on 3 days rest). If Petitte falters, that forces Game 7 with CC again on 3 days rest. Now I know he is a horse and has been doing this for a while now, but you never know. Maybe I&#8217;m wrong, but with the Yankees up 3-1, I might have gone to Chad Gaudin in Game 5, knowing that there was still Game 6 and 7 in New York witha rested Burnett or Petitte for Game 6 and CC for Game 7. If the Phils get into the Yankee &#8216;pen (before the great Rivera), that changes everything. They have not been effective. Of course, the Philly pen is a powder keg as well.</p>
<p>MW:  It is.  I was very surprised that Pettitte pitched as effectively as he did in Game 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob (from Burllington)</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42612</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob (from Burllington)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42612</guid>
		<description>Who cares about the Yankees and their huge payroll! Bottom line is whomever they have still has to do the job, still has to hit, pitch and play solid defence and they are doing it. A huge salary doesn&#039;t always equal huge returns as to hits etc! I would think any Jays fan should realize that. 

Like him or not Jeter is a solid all around player and there is not a team that wouldn&#039;t take him. Johnny Damon however is the backbone of that Yankees offence he is scary each and every time he is at the plate and even moreso in the late innings. He sure is missed in Beantown!

Someone here (Han Solo) said &quot;defence&quot; doesn&#039;t win games - say what; are you kidding me? Isn&#039;t good solid pitching your best defence? All you need do is look at what the powerful Yankee lineup has done against Cliff Lee and what the Phils have accomplished offensively against CC Sabathia.  If you have been watching any of the WS games you would realize that for certain, good defence wins ball games all the time.

What did you think of AJ and the lack of strike calls on his breaking stuff with one umpire Vs another Mike? It really showed when the network did a split screen showing the same pitch and same location calls from two different home plate umpires. 

AJ will never be able to keep his cool when he most needs to! Although, it must have been frustrating for him (AJ) not to get the strike calls he was getting in his previous start. I have to say however the ump last night was making very good balls and strike calls - at least from my point of view.

Finally, I thought it was hillarious to see Posada trying to call a second timeout in a row when he was at bat - the look on his face when the pitch (called strike)went sailing past him said it all.  

Thanks Mike, take care and keep up the great job you do.

MW:  The argument that &quot;they still have to play the games, no matter what the payroll&quot; is seriously, seriously flawed.  Remember, that the team with the higher payroll has a far better chance to have the better players, which makes it easier to win when they go out and play the games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares about the Yankees and their huge payroll! Bottom line is whomever they have still has to do the job, still has to hit, pitch and play solid defence and they are doing it. A huge salary doesn&#8217;t always equal huge returns as to hits etc! I would think any Jays fan should realize that. </p>
<p>Like him or not Jeter is a solid all around player and there is not a team that wouldn&#8217;t take him. Johnny Damon however is the backbone of that Yankees offence he is scary each and every time he is at the plate and even moreso in the late innings. He sure is missed in Beantown!</p>
<p>Someone here (Han Solo) said &#8220;defence&#8221; doesn&#8217;t win games &#8211; say what; are you kidding me? Isn&#8217;t good solid pitching your best defence? All you need do is look at what the powerful Yankee lineup has done against Cliff Lee and what the Phils have accomplished offensively against CC Sabathia.  If you have been watching any of the WS games you would realize that for certain, good defence wins ball games all the time.</p>
<p>What did you think of AJ and the lack of strike calls on his breaking stuff with one umpire Vs another Mike? It really showed when the network did a split screen showing the same pitch and same location calls from two different home plate umpires. </p>
<p>AJ will never be able to keep his cool when he most needs to! Although, it must have been frustrating for him (AJ) not to get the strike calls he was getting in his previous start. I have to say however the ump last night was making very good balls and strike calls &#8211; at least from my point of view.</p>
<p>Finally, I thought it was hillarious to see Posada trying to call a second timeout in a row when he was at bat &#8211; the look on his face when the pitch (called strike)went sailing past him said it all.  </p>
<p>Thanks Mike, take care and keep up the great job you do.</p>
<p>MW:  The argument that &#8220;they still have to play the games, no matter what the payroll&#8221; is seriously, seriously flawed.  Remember, that the team with the higher payroll has a far better chance to have the better players, which makes it easier to win when they go out and play the games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42601</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/11/02/aw-nuts/#comment-42601</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike

I was looking at the regular season statistics for the Phillies, and for the life of me i can&#039;t figure out how they won so many games with that pitching staff.  The starting rotation was bad and Lidge was an absolute disaster.  Any chance the Phillies take a chance and let Happ start a game instead of going back to Hamels?  Too bad Toronto and Philly couldn&#039;t get the Doc Halladay deal done, i think the Yanks would be in a lot of trouble if Doc was throwing in this series.....

MW:  Hopefully the Phillies are now kicking themselves for not making that Halladay deal.  As I said in July, the chance to win two or three straight World Series in a short period far outweighs any sort of loss of prospects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike</p>
<p>I was looking at the regular season statistics for the Phillies, and for the life of me i can&#8217;t figure out how they won so many games with that pitching staff.  The starting rotation was bad and Lidge was an absolute disaster.  Any chance the Phillies take a chance and let Happ start a game instead of going back to Hamels?  Too bad Toronto and Philly couldn&#8217;t get the Doc Halladay deal done, i think the Yanks would be in a lot of trouble if Doc was throwing in this series&#8230;..</p>
<p>MW:  Hopefully the Phillies are now kicking themselves for not making that Halladay deal.  As I said in July, the chance to win two or three straight World Series in a short period far outweighs any sort of loss of prospects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
