<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blanking The Baltimores</title>
	<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-37664</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-37664</guid>
		<description>My spelling is atrocius? Hardly... Punctuation? possibly, but not spelling. 

Unless your talking about the very common there/their mistake that billions of people make that I could care less about fixing since I wasn't aware I was in grammar class.  

MW:  You know what?  I'll give you the spelling thing.  That you don't know the difference between there, their and they're is as much a grammatical error as a spelling one.  So congrats on being one of "billions" who can't be bothered to properly use the language in which they're communicating.  You don't seem to know the difference between your and you're, either.  I deleted the rest of your post because you were insulting.  Ironic, I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My spelling is atrocius? Hardly&#8230; Punctuation? possibly, but not spelling. </p>
<p>Unless your talking about the very common there/their mistake that billions of people make that I could care less about fixing since I wasn&#8217;t aware I was in grammar class.  </p>
<p>MW:  You know what?  I&#8217;ll give you the spelling thing.  That you don&#8217;t know the difference between there, their and they&#8217;re is as much a grammatical error as a spelling one.  So congrats on being one of &#8220;billions&#8221; who can&#8217;t be bothered to properly use the language in which they&#8217;re communicating.  You don&#8217;t seem to know the difference between your and you&#8217;re, either.  I deleted the rest of your post because you were insulting.  Ironic, I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave_12</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36867</link>
		<dc:creator>dave_12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36867</guid>
		<description>Halladay's trade value slipped a bit after tonight's all star performance

MW:  Wait, are you guys serious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Halladay&#8217;s trade value slipped a bit after tonight&#8217;s all star performance</p>
<p>MW:  Wait, are you guys serious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary O</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36754</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36754</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike, in checking the boxscores, when they list the relievers, sometimes there is an H4, H7 or H8, what does this stand for?

MW:  Holds.  Didn't I answer that last week?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike, in checking the boxscores, when they list the relievers, sometimes there is an H4, H7 or H8, what does this stand for?</p>
<p>MW:  Holds.  Didn&#8217;t I answer that last week?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36753</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36753</guid>
		<description>25 million dollars in wasted salary in a span of 3 years, and this isn’t the first time he’s ate contracts (Lightenberg, Hentgen, possibly others) that’s got to be close to 10% of there entire budget over the course of the 3 years.

8 years of no playoffs, and has still failed to surpass a win total his predecessor had in a season,

Numerous media blunders, signing Wells to one of the worst contracts in all of baseball instead of trading him when his value was high,

Paying other teams to take his mistakes in trades (Koskie, Hinske to name a couple).

Getting very little return in his initial firesale(Mondesi, Quantrill, Lopez, Izturis, Gonzalez, Fullmer, Borbon),

Crippling the team financially with his back loaded contracts,

And a long list of “gambles” that didn’t pay off. Ryan, Thomas and Prokopec that had already been mentioned.
 
No wonder attendance is down big time this year. There just going to keep spinning there wheels as long as JP is in charge and the fans know it.

I wonder if they regret not going with Dave Dombrowski, you know the guy that took a 119 loss team to the World Series in just 3 years.

It is just insane JP still has a job.

MW: Your spelling is atrocious, and it takes away from your arguments. You can’t throw guys like Ohka, Zambrano, etc. out as marks against Ricciardi, because every team brings in a bunch of guys like that every year, and rarely do they work out. Your mind is already made up.



MW:  I spoke to some of his arguments.


Right.

MW:  OK, let me rephrase that.  I've spoken to all of his arguments dozens of times in this space - if not hundreds.  Go back and read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>25 million dollars in wasted salary in a span of 3 years, and this isn’t the first time he’s ate contracts (Lightenberg, Hentgen, possibly others) that’s got to be close to 10% of there entire budget over the course of the 3 years.</p>
<p>8 years of no playoffs, and has still failed to surpass a win total his predecessor had in a season,</p>
<p>Numerous media blunders, signing Wells to one of the worst contracts in all of baseball instead of trading him when his value was high,</p>
<p>Paying other teams to take his mistakes in trades (Koskie, Hinske to name a couple).</p>
<p>Getting very little return in his initial firesale(Mondesi, Quantrill, Lopez, Izturis, Gonzalez, Fullmer, Borbon),</p>
<p>Crippling the team financially with his back loaded contracts,</p>
<p>And a long list of “gambles” that didn’t pay off. Ryan, Thomas and Prokopec that had already been mentioned.</p>
<p>No wonder attendance is down big time this year. There just going to keep spinning there wheels as long as JP is in charge and the fans know it.</p>
<p>I wonder if they regret not going with Dave Dombrowski, you know the guy that took a 119 loss team to the World Series in just 3 years.</p>
<p>It is just insane JP still has a job.</p>
<p>MW: Your spelling is atrocious, and it takes away from your arguments. You can’t throw guys like Ohka, Zambrano, etc. out as marks against Ricciardi, because every team brings in a bunch of guys like that every year, and rarely do they work out. Your mind is already made up.</p>
<p>MW:  I spoke to some of his arguments.</p>
<p>Right.</p>
<p>MW:  OK, let me rephrase that.  I&#8217;ve spoken to all of his arguments dozens of times in this space - if not hundreds.  Go back and read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36752</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36752</guid>
		<description>Mike,
Should the Jays drift behind Baltimore in the 2nd half of this season barring trade or no trade re Halladay or Rolen is it safe to say "so long" to JP?

MW:  I wouldn't say safe, I'd say it could happen.  Remember what this team was supposed to do this season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
Should the Jays drift behind Baltimore in the 2nd half of this season barring trade or no trade re Halladay or Rolen is it safe to say &#8220;so long&#8221; to JP?</p>
<p>MW:  I wouldn&#8217;t say safe, I&#8217;d say it could happen.  Remember what this team was supposed to do this season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36750</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36750</guid>
		<description>Michael,

I think Barajas should have gone on the DL with that hamstring injury.  He looks really gimpy out there.  Also, he's just not very good to begin with.  

His backup Chavez is also superior defensively and basically the same offensive performer. 

Do you think the Jays will see this as a major area to address in the off-season or will they be content with mediocre production out of the C spot?

MW:  I would hope it's something they would address and you're right, Barajas should have gone on the DL.  They thought that J.P. Arencibia would be ready to take the reins by late this year, but that doesn't seem to be happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>I think Barajas should have gone on the DL with that hamstring injury.  He looks really gimpy out there.  Also, he&#8217;s just not very good to begin with.  </p>
<p>His backup Chavez is also superior defensively and basically the same offensive performer. </p>
<p>Do you think the Jays will see this as a major area to address in the off-season or will they be content with mediocre production out of the C spot?</p>
<p>MW:  I would hope it&#8217;s something they would address and you&#8217;re right, Barajas should have gone on the DL.  They thought that J.P. Arencibia would be ready to take the reins by late this year, but that doesn&#8217;t seem to be happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason c w</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36749</link>
		<dc:creator>jason c w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36749</guid>
		<description>In the twenty years I have been a jays fan,the last two years have been the most frustrating. The excuses why the team is losing, the wait until next year, the bad contracts, all have left a bad taste in my mouth. If this team is not supposed to contend in the near future then start dumping players. Trade Barjas, Overbay, Rolen, Rios, Scutaro, Macdonald, and try to get Wells off the team to. Clean house including JP, and rebuild around Hill, Lind, Snider and the young pitchers. And no more excuses, if a guy stinks he stinks, and Rios is no longer that good or Wells or Overbay.

MW:  Rios is having a poor year and Wells is having a very poor one.  Overbay is having a terrific season.  When a player struggles, it doesn't necessarily mean he's "no longer that good".  It could mean he's having a bad year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the twenty years I have been a jays fan,the last two years have been the most frustrating. The excuses why the team is losing, the wait until next year, the bad contracts, all have left a bad taste in my mouth. If this team is not supposed to contend in the near future then start dumping players. Trade Barjas, Overbay, Rolen, Rios, Scutaro, Macdonald, and try to get Wells off the team to. Clean house including JP, and rebuild around Hill, Lind, Snider and the young pitchers. And no more excuses, if a guy stinks he stinks, and Rios is no longer that good or Wells or Overbay.</p>
<p>MW:  Rios is having a poor year and Wells is having a very poor one.  Overbay is having a terrific season.  When a player struggles, it doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean he&#8217;s &#8220;no longer that good&#8221;.  It could mean he&#8217;s having a bad year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36747</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36747</guid>
		<description>Wow another 3 hits for inglett today.

The guy is a machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow another 3 hits for inglett today.</p>
<p>The guy is a machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36746</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36746</guid>
		<description>Norm Rumack is gone? Was this downsizing or 
should I ask? He seemed ok.

MW:  I'm not the one to ask about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norm Rumack is gone? Was this downsizing or<br />
should I ask? He seemed ok.</p>
<p>MW:  I&#8217;m not the one to ask about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36745</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2009/07/11/blanking-the-baltimores/#comment-36745</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike!

Seems like you're busy, no blog entries these days? Sad series loss to BAL. Anyways, I have a few noobish questions about baseball, nothing to do with the Jays. Hope you can answer them! And thanks for all your hard work!

1. Can a rookie pitcher win a Cy Young Award?
2. Can a relief pitcher win a Cy Young Award?
3. Why argue with the umpire when all you might get is an ejection, and no change to gameplay?
4. What's DER (fielding)? How do they calculate it?
5. What's 3.1 plate appearances? I know it's the minimum for something, but what's the 0.1? I know in innings, it's a third, but what is it in this situation?

Thanks. Looking forward to your reply. xD

MW:  1 - Yes.  2 - Yes.  3 - Good point.  4 - Defensive Efficiency Rating.  According to Baseball Prospectus, the formula to calculate it is:  1 - ((H + Reached On Error - HR) / (PA - BB - SO - HBP - HR)).  5 - In this situation it's actually what it's supposed to be - one-tenth.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike!</p>
<p>Seems like you&#8217;re busy, no blog entries these days? Sad series loss to BAL. Anyways, I have a few noobish questions about baseball, nothing to do with the Jays. Hope you can answer them! And thanks for all your hard work!</p>
<p>1. Can a rookie pitcher win a Cy Young Award?<br />
2. Can a relief pitcher win a Cy Young Award?<br />
3. Why argue with the umpire when all you might get is an ejection, and no change to gameplay?<br />
4. What&#8217;s DER (fielding)? How do they calculate it?<br />
5. What&#8217;s 3.1 plate appearances? I know it&#8217;s the minimum for something, but what&#8217;s the 0.1? I know in innings, it&#8217;s a third, but what is it in this situation?</p>
<p>Thanks. Looking forward to your reply. xD</p>
<p>MW:  1 - Yes.  2 - Yes.  3 - Good point.  4 - Defensive Efficiency Rating.  According to Baseball Prospectus, the formula to calculate it is:  1 - ((H + Reached On Error - HR) / (PA - BB - SO - HBP - HR)).  5 - In this situation it&#8217;s actually what it&#8217;s supposed to be - one-tenth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
