<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Take On Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/</link>
	<description>Covering the MLB with a focus on the Toronto Blue Jays</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-8105</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-8105</guid>
		<description>How is it fair for broadcasters and writers to critique and judge players, yet they feel they should be free of all criticism?  Broadcasters/writers should be held to the same standard as those they write about or discuss.

MW:  Who says that broadcasters and writers should be free from all criticism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it fair for broadcasters and writers to critique and judge players, yet they feel they should be free of all criticism?  Broadcasters/writers should be held to the same standard as those they write about or discuss.</p>
<p>MW:  Who says that broadcasters and writers should be free from all criticism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilan Woll</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-8070</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilan Woll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-8070</guid>
		<description>There is an amazing ability to hate the anonymous person out there (just ask Willie Randolph), but it seems to me the Jays are 1-2 solid young-ish bats away from being contenders.

Reed Johnson - great singles hitter v. lefties but not much else.  Really no huge loss for the Jays.

You - hey, its very difficult to be honest and not get hostility.  Just remember how many people despised Cosell (not that you are similar, but valid comparison).  To quote Harry S. Truman, former PM of the United States &quot;I don&#039;t give &#039;em hell, I give them the truth and they think its hell&quot;.

MW:  I like the Truman quote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an amazing ability to hate the anonymous person out there (just ask Willie Randolph), but it seems to me the Jays are 1-2 solid young-ish bats away from being contenders.</p>
<p>Reed Johnson &#8211; great singles hitter v. lefties but not much else.  Really no huge loss for the Jays.</p>
<p>You &#8211; hey, its very difficult to be honest and not get hostility.  Just remember how many people despised Cosell (not that you are similar, but valid comparison).  To quote Harry S. Truman, former PM of the United States &#8220;I don&#8217;t give &#8216;em hell, I give them the truth and they think its hell&#8221;.</p>
<p>MW:  I like the Truman quote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan W</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-7999</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-7999</guid>
		<description>&quot;When disrespect is presented, it’s returned.&quot;

Not that I should be talking, but don&#039;t you think radio personalities should be able to take the high ground?

MW:  Why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When disrespect is presented, it’s returned.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not that I should be talking, but don&#8217;t you think radio personalities should be able to take the high ground?</p>
<p>MW:  Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-7985</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-7985</guid>
		<description>Mike,

I rarely listen to the radio or read the papers anymore due to the reactionary, venom-filled, and inaccurate reporting, as well as reliance on &quot;motivation&quot; and &quot;effort&quot; to explain sporting results.

By happenstance I turned on the Fan while in the car on Saturday and came across a voice talking about Eckstein and his two World Series rings.

I was overjoyed when this person was correctly called out by you, while Eckstein was indeed on two champion teams, that is far more due to luck than anything.

I will now make an effort to listen to you more often. Perhaps you could be more civil, but so long as you don&#039;t venture into the name calling business that many of your peers have I don&#039;t have any problem with it.

Thanks again from a new fan.

MW:  Glad to have you aboard!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>I rarely listen to the radio or read the papers anymore due to the reactionary, venom-filled, and inaccurate reporting, as well as reliance on &#8220;motivation&#8221; and &#8220;effort&#8221; to explain sporting results.</p>
<p>By happenstance I turned on the Fan while in the car on Saturday and came across a voice talking about Eckstein and his two World Series rings.</p>
<p>I was overjoyed when this person was correctly called out by you, while Eckstein was indeed on two champion teams, that is far more due to luck than anything.</p>
<p>I will now make an effort to listen to you more often. Perhaps you could be more civil, but so long as you don&#8217;t venture into the name calling business that many of your peers have I don&#8217;t have any problem with it.</p>
<p>Thanks again from a new fan.</p>
<p>MW:  Glad to have you aboard!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-7854</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-7854</guid>
		<description>Mike, I just commented on another thread, but, for what it&#039;s worth I think Mike Toth crossed a line in terms of letting one show be used &#039;against&#039; another show. But remember, people rip people behind their backs all the time. Do people only insult Paris Hilton when she&#039;s in the room? Do people wait until Stephen Harper can hear them until they call him an idiot? The world does not work like that. Sure - you should also have the guts to insult people to their face, but you can&#039;t entirely write off people&#039;s right to express an opinion. So Toth crossed a line. The callers were just saying what they thought, given a platform. I would not have done it, but I don&#039;t think they were unethical.

I can imagine you two are chalk and cheese in terms of your approach to bsaeball (and Toth&#039;s really a hockey guy, no?) However I also have to say I really like his shows. I sort of look forward to him filling in for McCown. On Friday&#039;s PTS Toth seemed to be a bit apologetic, and implied he got into a lot of trouble, maybe from the bosses?, so maybe he&#039;s learned his lesson?! 

He&#039;s been brave in his own way over the years - I&#039;ve heard him talking about depression and the problems it caused his first marriage, and how he used to hide under his desk to avoid people. That takes some guts in the macho Fan590 building I would guess. It also could seriously threaten your career prospects! So I think he was wrong, and I think he is a fundamentally different sort of broadcaster to you, but I think he also has his place.

Oh. Keep Burnett. he&#039;s the best 5th starter in baseball. A serious trade up from John Towers. (I&#039;m only being partly tongue in cheek.) Why not pay a gazillion dollars for your 5th starter when your 2nd, 3rd and 4th cost peanuts? In only 8 years of watching baseball it&#039;s seemed to me you should never trade away good (or even moderate) starters. Period.

MW:  Chalk and cheese?  I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, I just commented on another thread, but, for what it&#8217;s worth I think Mike Toth crossed a line in terms of letting one show be used &#8216;against&#8217; another show. But remember, people rip people behind their backs all the time. Do people only insult Paris Hilton when she&#8217;s in the room? Do people wait until Stephen Harper can hear them until they call him an idiot? The world does not work like that. Sure &#8211; you should also have the guts to insult people to their face, but you can&#8217;t entirely write off people&#8217;s right to express an opinion. So Toth crossed a line. The callers were just saying what they thought, given a platform. I would not have done it, but I don&#8217;t think they were unethical.</p>
<p>I can imagine you two are chalk and cheese in terms of your approach to bsaeball (and Toth&#8217;s really a hockey guy, no?) However I also have to say I really like his shows. I sort of look forward to him filling in for McCown. On Friday&#8217;s PTS Toth seemed to be a bit apologetic, and implied he got into a lot of trouble, maybe from the bosses?, so maybe he&#8217;s learned his lesson?! </p>
<p>He&#8217;s been brave in his own way over the years &#8211; I&#8217;ve heard him talking about depression and the problems it caused his first marriage, and how he used to hide under his desk to avoid people. That takes some guts in the macho Fan590 building I would guess. It also could seriously threaten your career prospects! So I think he was wrong, and I think he is a fundamentally different sort of broadcaster to you, but I think he also has his place.</p>
<p>Oh. Keep Burnett. he&#8217;s the best 5th starter in baseball. A serious trade up from John Towers. (I&#8217;m only being partly tongue in cheek.) Why not pay a gazillion dollars for your 5th starter when your 2nd, 3rd and 4th cost peanuts? In only 8 years of watching baseball it&#8217;s seemed to me you should never trade away good (or even moderate) starters. Period.</p>
<p>MW:  Chalk and cheese?  I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shmuel</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-7824</link>
		<dc:creator>Shmuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 04:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-7824</guid>
		<description>There is no legitimate baseball reason to give a healthy, all-star calibre everyday player three days off out of six.  Therefore, if Rolen was healthy, he should have been in the lineup.

You raise another point that bothers me about the way the Jays are being managed.  If it&#039;s true that B.J. Ryan was going to pitch the ninth regardless of how long Marcum pitched, then that is irresponsible managing.  If Ryan still needs to come into certain games as part of his healing process, then he should still be in the minors.  You can&#039;t put one player ahead of the team.  If he had been in a zone and pitching lights out in recent games, that would be one thing.  The way he&#039;s pitching, he should not be brought in when the game is tied.

MW:  I don&#039;t believe Rolen is healthy, and I don&#039;t believe that Ryan would have pitched in the 9th because of the healing process, but because he was the best option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no legitimate baseball reason to give a healthy, all-star calibre everyday player three days off out of six.  Therefore, if Rolen was healthy, he should have been in the lineup.</p>
<p>You raise another point that bothers me about the way the Jays are being managed.  If it&#8217;s true that B.J. Ryan was going to pitch the ninth regardless of how long Marcum pitched, then that is irresponsible managing.  If Ryan still needs to come into certain games as part of his healing process, then he should still be in the minors.  You can&#8217;t put one player ahead of the team.  If he had been in a zone and pitching lights out in recent games, that would be one thing.  The way he&#8217;s pitching, he should not be brought in when the game is tied.</p>
<p>MW:  I don&#8217;t believe Rolen is healthy, and I don&#8217;t believe that Ryan would have pitched in the 9th because of the healing process, but because he was the best option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-7763</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-7763</guid>
		<description>Mike, although I never heard what Toth exactly said, I just want you to know that I think that you are a great broadcaster. Keep up the great work. I also wondered where I could listen to Toth&#039;s comments so I could hear exactly what was being discussed. Thanks, Mike.

MW:  As far as I know, they&#039;re not available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, although I never heard what Toth exactly said, I just want you to know that I think that you are a great broadcaster. Keep up the great work. I also wondered where I could listen to Toth&#8217;s comments so I could hear exactly what was being discussed. Thanks, Mike.</p>
<p>MW:  As far as I know, they&#8217;re not available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob M</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-7747</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-7747</guid>
		<description>Re Jack Morris:

&quot;Stuff&quot; aside, Morris was a legend because he could often win the big game.  He was way better than a .500 pitcher.

Burnett has broken 200 innings twice (barely) in his career. You would have to agree that you would take the make up and character of Morris over Burnett.  Wouldn&#039;t you?

MW:  I would, but more the durability.  But I still like Burnett&#039;s stuff better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Jack Morris:</p>
<p>&#8220;Stuff&#8221; aside, Morris was a legend because he could often win the big game.  He was way better than a .500 pitcher.</p>
<p>Burnett has broken 200 innings twice (barely) in his career. You would have to agree that you would take the make up and character of Morris over Burnett.  Wouldn&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>MW:  I would, but more the durability.  But I still like Burnett&#8217;s stuff better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MG</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-7724</link>
		<dc:creator>MG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-7724</guid>
		<description>Your radio program functions as a public service, teaching argumentative logic to the masses. 

I&#039;ve always commended you for having the cajones to treat commercial sports-talk radio as an opportunity for academic, if often tragically one-sided, debate.

Thx

MW:  Why thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your radio program functions as a public service, teaching argumentative logic to the masses. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always commended you for having the cajones to treat commercial sports-talk radio as an opportunity for academic, if often tragically one-sided, debate.</p>
<p>Thx</p>
<p>MW:  Why thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-7676</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rogersbroadcasting.com/mikewilner/2008/06/11/take-on-me/#comment-7676</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike,
I&#039;m a long time listener, and love your show. When listening to your show, I often wonder at your patience (although being the son of teacher... it&#039;s probably genetic)! While there are some good questions, a majority of the callers tend to ask the same questions (or slight variations) over and over again.  Your wit is what keeps it interesting :)  Personally it&#039;s my weapon of choice as well.

Thanks for all the brilliant shows!

-Jen

MW:  My pleasure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike,<br />
I&#8217;m a long time listener, and love your show. When listening to your show, I often wonder at your patience (although being the son of teacher&#8230; it&#8217;s probably genetic)! While there are some good questions, a majority of the callers tend to ask the same questions (or slight variations) over and over again.  Your wit is what keeps it interesting :)  Personally it&#8217;s my weapon of choice as well.</p>
<p>Thanks for all the brilliant shows!</p>
<p>-Jen</p>
<p>MW:  My pleasure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
