image

 

 

Turns out that Mine That Bird’s remarkable win in the Kentucky Derby was not the

most surprising upset in May. As far as a tote board explosion is concerned, Stinger Blue

Chip rattled the bettors the most, roaring up in late stretch to score by length in the

$73,500 final of the Diplomat Pacing Series Saturday night, May 9  at Mohawk, and he did so at eye

-popping odds of more than 90-1 for catch driver Jason Brewer. The $193.40 he paid almost makes the

 $103 payoff from Mine That Bird look like small change. Well, not quite.

 

 

I was the benificiary of a most unusual payoff last Sunday. If you allow me, I will rant on for hours about

the mathematical advantages of playing the daily double. So there I was Sunday, handicapping the first

 race at Woodbine and I see that Patrick Husbands is almost 5-1 on Sir Heart Throb. Here’s a tip. If you

 ever see Patrick Husbands at better than 3-1, go to the window, bet heavily. Husbands is so zoned in,

 it’s insane. He could win on a donkey. Sir Heart Throb had a few decnet lines, aside from having the

 track’s best jockey on his back  I wheeled him in the double with three win the second, making sure to

 include Sweet Therapy in the second. Sweet Therapy was ridden by Chantal Sutherland, and though

 I have already characterized Husbands as the best rider on the grounds, it’s amazing how many

 Sutherland horses produce their highest Beyer number. Rule of thumb – any horse ridden by Chantal has

 to be considered.

 

So Husbands wins the first and the horse pays  a happy $11.50 to win and Sweet Therapy goes off at

7-2 and pulls away to win the second. That would be the third favourite hooked up with the second

 favourite and a couple of the track’s most bettable riders. So explain me this: How does the double pay

 $130.50? That’s 64-1.If you apply a little math to the two winners, you get about 18-1. So the double

 returned about 3 1/2 times the value of the win prices. 

 

I didn’t bet the pick 3, but I wish I had.  I did hit the third race exactor. The winner paid $13.90. Again, a

 $2 parlay on the first three winners would have been worth less than $400,  but a $1 pick 3 paid

 $743.45 or more than three and a half times the value of the win prices on the three horses.

 

It’s all about pari-miutuel wagering. Unfortunately only a tiny percentage of the people who go to the

 track (and virtually no one who doesn’t) has the vaguest idea how pari-mutuels work. I won’t bore you

 with a wordy explanation, but suffice it to say, a person at the track with a grasp on the pari-mutuels will

 always do better than anyone playing the lotteries or scratch tickets or slots. The afore-mentioned

 payoffs were posted in advance, so the alert bettor was able to see that there was tremendous value in

 one betting pool that was not present in another. 

Leave a Reply